4.7 Review

Advances in polysaccharides of natural source of the anti-Alzheimer's disease effect and mechanism

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 296, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119961

Keywords

Polysaccharide; Alzheimer's disease; ?-Amyloid; Oxidative stress; Neuroinflammation; Apoptosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81973218]
  2. Taishan Industry Leading Talents Project [tscy20200410]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019MH082]
  4. Open Projects Fund of NMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Research and Evaluation of Carbohydrate -based Medicine [2021QRECM02]
  5. Shandong Key Laboratory of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Glycobiology, Shandong University [2021CCG05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews recent research on the regulation of natural polysaccharides in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and systematically lists possible intervention pathways of polysaccharides targeting different mechanisms.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder. The pathology is characterized by the gen-eration of amyloid plaques and neuronal fiber tangles in the brain. Although decades of research have been conducted, there is still a lack of effective treatments and countermeasures. Polysaccharide components of natural origin obtained by extraction and isolation possess a variety of pharmacological activities and medicinal values, and they are receiving increasing attention. Polysaccharides have shown good promise in the field of AD prevention and treatment, and polysaccharides ameliorate AD in multiple ways by targeting different mecha-nisms with almost no toxic side effects. In this paper, we review the research on polysaccharides of natural sources regulation in AD in recent years and list systematically the possible intervention pathways of poly-saccharides targeting different mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available