4.1 Article

Ocular proton therapy, pencil beam scanning high energy proton therapy or stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanoma; an in silico study

Journal

CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 1027-1033

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.03.003

Keywords

Ocular; uveal melanoma; Radiotherapy; Proton therapy; Stereotactic radiotherapy; CyberKnife R; Dose

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed the performances of ocular proton therapy compared to other radiotherapy techniques and found that ocular proton therapy showed better precision, shorter treatment delivery time, better dose homogeneity, and reduced maximal/mean doses to critical ocular structures compared to other external beam radiation modalities.
Purpose. - In radiotherapy, the dose and volumes of the irradiated normal tissues is correlated to the complication rate. We assessed the performances of low-energy proton therapy (ocular PT) with eye -dedicated equipment, high energy PT with pencil-beam scanning (PBS) or CyberKnifeR-based stereotactic irradiation (SBRT). Material and methods. - CT-based comparative dose distribution between external beam radiotherapy techniques was assessed using an anthropomorphic head phantom. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy RBE in 4 fractions to a typical posterior pole uveal melanoma. Clinically relevant structures were delineated, and doses were calculated using radiotherapy treatment planning softwares and measured using Gafchromic dosimetry films inserted at the ocular level. Results. - Precision was significantly better with ocular PT than both PBS or SBRT in terms of beam penumbra (80%-20%: laterally 1.4 vs. >= 10 mm, distally 0.8 vs. >= 2.5 mm). Ocular PT duration was shorter, allowing eye gating and lid sparing more easily. Tumor was excellent with all modalities, but ocular PT resulted in more homogenous and conformal dose compared to PBS or SBRT. The maximal dose to ocular/orbital structures at risk was smaller and often null with ocular PT compared to other modalities. Mean dose to ocular/orbital structures was also lower with ocular PT. Structures like the lids and lacrimal punctum could be preserved with ocular PT using gaze orientation and lid retractors, which is easier to implement clinically than with the other modalities. The dose to distant organs was null with ocular PT and PBS, in contrast to SBRT. Conclusions. - ocular PT showed significantly improved beam penumbra, shorter treatment delivery time, better dose homogeneity, and reduced maximal/mean doses to critical ocular structures compared with other current external beam radiation modalities. Similar comparisons may be warranted for other tumor presentations. (c) 2022 Socie acute accent te acute accent franc , aise de radiothe acute accent rapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available