☆ 4.5 Editorial Material

Estimating Cancer Screening Sensitivity and Specificity Using Healthcare Utilization Data: Defining the Accuracy Assessment Interval

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION (2022)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard - a comparison of correction methods

Chinyereugo M. Umemneku Chikere et al.

Summary: The study compared correction methods developed by Staquet et al. and Brenner, finding that Staquet et al.'s method outperforms Brenner's under the assumption of conditional independence. However, in cases of very high or low disease prevalence, or when there is conditional dependence between tests, other statistical methods should be considered.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Verification bias

Jack W. O'Sullivan et al.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Interval cancers in a guaiac-based colorectal cancer screening programme: Consequences on sensitivity

Johannes Blom et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Screening for Colorectal Cancer Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

Jennifer S. Lin et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Sensitivity and specificity of mammographic screening as practised in Vermont and Norway

S. Hofvind et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2012)

Add to Collection

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Bias in estimating accuracy of a binary screening test with differential disease verification

Todd A. Alonzo et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2011)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Effect of Verification Bias on the Sensitivity of Fecal Occult Blood Testing: a Meta-Analysis

Alan S. Rosman et al.

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2010)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

A simple method to estimate the episode and programme sensitivity of breast cancer screening programmes

Manuel Zorzi et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING (2010)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality

Deborah H. Glueck et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2009)

Add to Collection

Review Oncology

Quality of mammography screening in the Milan programme: Evidence of improved sensitivity based on interval cancer proportional incidence and radiological review

Pirola Maria Elena et al.

BREAST (2009)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Interval cancer incidence and episode sensitivity in the Norrbotten Mammography Screening Programme, Sweden

Pal Bordas et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING (2009)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Sensitivity in cancer screening

Matti Hakama et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING (2007)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

Episode sensitivity in association with process indicators in the Finnish breast cancer screening program

T Sarkeala et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2006)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.