4.4 Article

A tale of two fishes: depth preference of migrating Atlantic salmon smolt and predatory brown trout in a Norwegian lake

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES
Volume 79, Issue 12, Pages 2216-2224

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2022-0016

Keywords

vulnerability; predator-prey; acoustic telemetry; exorheic lakes

Funding

  1. Norwegian Research Council [320726]
  2. BKK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tracked the depth use of 22 Atlantic salmon smolts and 21 brown trout in a basin of Lake Evanger, Norway, and found that both species tended to distribute relatively shallow in the lake and exhibited overlapping vertical distribution. Despite the behavior of the salmon smolts aligning with the risk allocation hypothesis, a significant number of tagged smolts fell victim to predation.
To understand the predator-prey interactions during this transitional migration, we tracked 22 Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts and their most prevalent predator, brown trout (Salmo trutta) (N = 21), and recorded their depth use in a basin of Lake Evanger, Norway, with acoustic telemetry during May 2020. Both salmon smolts (mean +/- SD: 3.8 +/- 3.3 m) and trout (2.9 +/- 1.7 m) were distributed relatively shallow in the lake despite depths in the area largely exceeding 30 m. Both species were deeper at midday and smolts tended to be deeper in the water earlier in the migration, overlapping less with trout early in May, but as daily daylight increased and water temperature warmed vertical distribution of smolts and trout increasingly overlapped. Based on depth traces from the tags, only seven were detected at the end of the lake and confirmed tomake it through. Despite the behaviour of the salmon smolts mostly matching with predictions of the risk allocation hypothesis, it seems a large share of the tagged smolts succumbed to predation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available