4.6 Review

The Ongoing Saga of the Evolution of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From Balloon Angioplasty to Recent Innovations to Future Prospects

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 10, Pages S30-S41

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.06.019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec e Sante (FRQS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been achieved through the work of pioneers in surgery, radiology, and interventional cardiology. With the development of technology and dissemination of best-practice techniques, PCI has become more effective in treating complex lesions and high-risk patients.
The advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been, above all, dependent on the work of pioneers in surgery, radiology, and interventional cardiology. From Gruntzig's first balloon angioplasty, PCI has expanded through technology development, improved protocols, and dissemination of best-practice techniques. We can nowadays treat more complex lesions in higher-risk patients with favourable results. Guide wires, balloon types and profiles, debulking techniques such as atherectomy or lithotripsy, stents, and scaffolds all represent evolutions that have allowed us to tackle complex lesions such as an unprotected left main coronary artery, complex bifurcations, or chronic total occlusions. Best-practice PCI, including physiology assessment, imaging, and optimal lesion preparation are now the gold standard when performing PCI for sound indications, and new technologies such as intravascular lithotripsy for lesion preparation, or artificial intelligence, are innovations in the steps of 4 decades of pioneers to improve patient care in interventional cardiology. In the present review, major innovations in PCI since the first balloon angioplasty and also uncertainties and obstacles inherent to such medical advances are described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available