4.6 Article

A computational model for prediction of ferritin and haemoglobin levels in blood donors

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 199, Issue 1, Pages 143-152

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18367

Keywords

blood donors; ferritin; prediction model

Categories

Funding

  1. European Blood Alliance [2020-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used a computational model and baseline values to predict the levels of hemoglobin and ferritin in blood donors, and calculated the optimal donation frequencies. The results showed that baseline ferritin levels were the most important factor in predicting future levels, which can help donors determine the most suitable donation frequency.
Blood donors are at risk of iron deficiency anaemia. While this risk is decreased through ferritin-based deferral, ideally ferritin monitoring should also aid in optimising donation frequencies. We extended an existing model of haemoglobin (Hb) synthesis with iron homeostasis and validated the model on a cohort of 300 new donors whose ferritin levels were measured from stored blood samples collected over a 2-year period. We then used the donor's gender, body weight, height, and baseline Hb and ferritin levels to predict subsequent Hb and ferritin levels. The prediction error was within measurement variability in 88% of Hb level predictions and 64% of ferritin level predictions. A sensitivity analysis of the model revealed that baseline ferritin level was the most important in predicting future ferritin levels. Finally, we used the model to calculate the annual donation frequency at which donors would keep their ferritin level >15 ng/ml when measured after donating for 2 years. The mean annual donation frequency would then be 1.9 for women and 4.1 for men. The computational model, requiring baseline values only, can predict future Hb and ferritin levels remarkably well. This enables determination of optimal donation frequencies for individual donors at the start of their donation career.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available