4.6 Review

Clinical research activity in periodontal medicine: a systematic mapping of trial registers

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 390-400

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12534

Keywords

clinical trials; periodontal diseases; periodontal medicine; periodontitis; systematic review

Funding

  1. Midi-Pyrenees region, Paul Sabatier University
  2. Toulouse Dental Faculty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: The primary aim of the study was to systematically map registration records on periodontal medicine in clinical trial registers. The secondary aim was to assess the evolution of periodontal medicine in clinical periodontal research as a whole. Material and Methods: We searched all registration records related to periodontology in the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. For registration records classified in the field of periodontal medicine, we assigned the 2015 MeSH (R) term for the most precisely corresponding systemic condition. Results: Fifty-seven systemic conditions have been hypothesized to be linked with periodontal diseases, covering nearly 2% of the diseases indexed in MeSH. In addition to diabetes, cardiovascular disease or preterm birth, other systemic conditions have been the subject of registration records, such as anaemia, liver diseases, dyspepsia or ankylosing spondylitis. A trend towards increasing diversification of systemic conditions has appeared over time. About a third of registration records in clinical periodontal research deals with periodontal medicine. Conclusions: Periodontal medicine now constitutes an important part of clinical periodontal research. Research activity in periodontal medicine has grown continuously since the early 2000s, and exploration of registers gives a useful up-to-date snapshot of this constantly evolving field of research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available