4.7 Article

Interpretable surface-based detection of focal cortical dysplasias: a Multi-centre Epilepsy Lesion Detection study

Journal

BRAIN
Volume 145, Issue 11, Pages 3859-3871

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac224

Keywords

focal cortical dysplasia; epilepsy; structural MRI; machine learning

Funding

  1. Rosetrees Trust [A2665]
  2. NIHR GOSH BRC
  3. Wellcome Trust [218380, 215901/Z/19/Z]
  4. CNF/PERF Shields Award
  5. CNRI Chief Research Officer Award
  6. Hess Foundation
  7. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2013/07559-3]
  8. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship - Royal Society [206675/Z/17/Z]
  9. Medical Research Council Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London [MR/N026063/1]
  10. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82071457]
  11. MRC [G0802012, MR/MR00841X/1]
  12. Alan Turing Institute under the EPSRC [EP/N510129/1]
  13. NIH [R01 NS109439]
  14. Tuscany Region Call for Health 2018 (grant DECODE-EE)
  15. NIHR
  16. GOSH Children's Charity Surgeon-Scientist Fellowship
  17. BRAIN Unit Infrastructure Award [UA05]
  18. Welsh Government through Health and Care Research Wales
  19. Saastamoinen Foundation
  20. NHMRC [APP1176426]
  21. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship - Wellcome Trust [206675/Z/17/Z]
  22. Wellcome Trust [215901/Z/19/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the challenges in applying machine learning to diagnostic biomedical imaging is the interpretability of algorithms. This study developed an open-source and interpretable machine-learning algorithm to automatically identify FCDs from structural MRI data, improving the confidence of physicians in identifying subtle MRI lesions in individuals with epilepsy.
One outstanding challenge for machine learning in diagnostic biomedical imaging is algorithm interpretability. A key application is the identification of subtle epileptogenic focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) from structural MRI. FCDs are difficult to visualize on structural MRI but are often amenable to surgical resection. We aimed to develop an open-source, interpretable, surface-based machine-learning algorithm to automatically identify FCDs on heterogeneous structural MRI data from epilepsy surgery centres worldwide. The Multi-centre Epilepsy Lesion Detection (MELD) Project collated and harmonized a retrospective MRI cohort of 1015 participants, 618 patients with focal FCD-related epilepsy and 397 controls, from 22 epilepsy centres worldwide. We created a neural network for FCD detection based on 33 surface-based features. The network was trained and cross-validated on 50% of the total cohort and tested on the remaining 50% as well as on 2 independent test sites. Multidimensional feature analysis and integrated gradient saliencies were used to interrogate network performance. Our pipeline outputs individual patient reports, which identify the location of predicted lesions, alongside their imaging features and relative saliency to the classifier. On a restricted 'gold-standard' subcohort of seizure-free patients with FCD type IIB who had T-1 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI data, the MELD FCD surface-based algorithm had a sensitivity of 85%. Across the entire withheld test cohort the sensitivity was 59% and specificity was 54%. After including a border zone around lesions, to account for uncertainty around the borders of manually delineated lesion masks, the sensitivity was 67%. This multicentre, multinational study with open access protocols and code has developed a robust and interpretable machine-learning algorithm for automated detection of focal cortical dysplasias, giving physicians greater confidence in the identification of subtle MRI lesions in individuals with epilepsy. Spitzer et al. present a robust and interpretable open-source machine-learning algorithm for automated detection of focal cortical dysplasias. The pipeline outputs individual patient reports, which identify the location of predicted lesions, alongside their imaging features and relative saliency to the classifier.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available