4.7 Article

Neurofilament light levels predict clinical progression and death in multiple system atrophy

Journal

BRAIN
Volume 145, Issue 12, Pages 4398-4408

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac253

Keywords

multiple system atrophy; MSA; NfL

Funding

  1. MSA Trust (PROSPECT-M-UK)
  2. Multiple System Atrophy Coalition, Medical Research Council ( MRC) [UK MR/J004758/1, G0802760, G1001253]
  3. Wellcome Trust (Synaptopathies) [WT093205MA, WT104033/Z/14/Z]
  4. French Clinical Research Programme [AOI 2011-BIOAMS, API 2012-BIOPARK]
  5. PSP Association (PROSPECT-M-UK)
  6. `Solve-RD' from the Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [779257]
  7. Multiple System Atrophy Trust/ABN Clinical Research Training fellowship [F84 ABN 540868]
  8. Multiple System Atrophy Trust (PROSPECT-M-UK Project)
  9. Multiple System Atrophy Coalition [567540]
  10. Guarantors of Brain [565908]
  11. King Baudouin Foundation (Sophia Fund)
  12. Swedish Research Council [2018-02532]
  13. European Research Council [681712]
  14. King Baudouin Foundation [ALFGBG-720931]
  15. Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), USA [201809-2016862]
  16. Alzheimer's Association [ADSF-21-831376-C, ADSF-21-831381-C, ADSF-21-831377-C]
  17. Olav Thon Stiftelsen
  18. Erling-Persson Family Foundation
  19. Stiftelsen for Gamla Tjanarinnor
  20. Hjarnfonden, Sweden [FO2019-0228]
  21. European Union [860197]
  22. European Union Joint Program for Neurodegenerative Disorders [JPND2021-00694]
  23. UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL
  24. Wellcome Trust
  25. NIHR Rare Diseases Translational Research Collaboration [BRC149/NS/MH]
  26. Bluefield Project
  27. Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration
  28. Alzheimer's Society, UK [AS-JF-19a-004-517]
  29. UK Dementia Research Institute - DRI Ltd.
  30. UK Medical Research Council
  31. Alzheimer's Society
  32. Alzheimer's Research UK
  33. Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF)
  34. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Sante (FRQS) postdoctoral fellowship
  35. Clinician Scientist Program of the Medical Faculty Tubingen [480-0-0]
  36. Centres de Recerca de Catalunya (CERCA) Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya
  37. Institute of Neurosciences
  38. Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS)
  39. CIBERNED
  40. Generalitat de Catalunya [2017SGR748]
  41. Maria de Maeztu Unit of Excellence (Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona) [MDM-2017-0729]
  42. Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
  43. Fundacio Marato TV3 [20142730]
  44. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CM18/ 00072]
  45. NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre [BRC-1215-20014]
  46. Medical Research Council [SUAG/092 G168768]
  47. Cellectricon
  48. Fujirebio
  49. Alzecure
  50. Biogen
  51. Roche
  52. Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS)
  53. Parkinson's UK
  54. Dystonia UK
  55. Michael J. Fox Foundation
  56. Abbvie
  57. Cure Parkinson's Trust
  58. CBD Solutions
  59. Drake Foundation
  60. Medical Research Council
  61. PSP Association
  62. Wellcome Trust [220258]
  63. [MR/M008525/1]
  64. [739510]
  65. [PID2020-114640GB-I00]
  66. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [779257] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, it was found that plasma neurofilament light chain levels correlate with clinical disease severity, progression, and prognosis in multiple system atrophy, providing valuable information for patient stratification and treatment response monitoring in future trials. The use of neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in multiple system atrophy holds promise for improving trial outcomes and streamlining participant recruitment. Further research is warranted to fully understand the potential of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy management.
In this large multiple system atrophy cohort, Chelban et al. show that plasma NfL correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis, and could help inform patient stratification and monitor treatment responses in future trials of putative disease-modifying agents. Disease-modifying treatments are currently being trialled in multiple system atrophy. Approaches based solely on clinical measures are challenged by heterogeneity of phenotype and pathogenic complexity. Neurofilament light chain protein has been explored as a reliable biomarker in several neurodegenerative disorders but data on multiple system atrophy have been limited. Therefore, neurofilament light chain is not yet routinely used as an outcome measure in multiple system atrophy. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the role and dynamics of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy combined with cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical and imaging scales and for subject trial selection. In this cohort study, we recruited cross-sectional and longitudinal cases in a multicentre European set-up. Plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain concentrations were measured at baseline from 212 multiple system atrophy cases, annually for a mean period of 2 years in 44 multiple system atrophy patients in conjunction with clinical, neuropsychological and MRI brain assessments. Baseline neurofilament light chain characteristics were compared between groups. Cox regression was used to assess survival; receiver operating characteristic analysis to assess the ability of neurofilament light chain to distinguish between multiple system atrophy patients and healthy controls. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were used to analyse longitudinal neurofilament light chain changes and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters. Polynomial models were used to determine the differential trajectories of neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy. We estimated sample sizes for trials aiming to decrease neurofilament light chain levels. We show that in multiple system atrophy, baseline plasma neurofilament light chain levels were better predictors of clinical progression, survival and degree of brain atrophy than the neurofilament light chain rate of change. Comparative analysis of multiple system atrophy progression over the course of disease, using plasma neurofilament light chain and clinical rating scales, indicated that neurofilament light chain levels rise as the motor symptoms progress, followed by deceleration in advanced stages. Sample size prediction suggested that significantly lower trial participant numbers would be needed to demonstrate treatment effects when incorporating plasma neurofilament light chain values into multiple system atrophy clinical trials in comparison to clinical measures alone. In conclusion, neurofilament light chain correlates with clinical disease severity, progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy. Combined with clinical and imaging analysis, neurofilament light chain can inform patient stratification and serve as a reliable biomarker of treatment response in future multiple system atrophy trials of putative disease-modifying agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available