4.4 Article

Coverage analysis in a targeted amplicon-based next-generation sequencing panel for myeloid neoplasms

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 9, Pages 801-804

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203580

Keywords

GENETICS; LEUKAEMIA; MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY

Categories

Funding

  1. NMRC Clinician Scientist Investigator Award
  2. Singapore Cancer Syndicate Grant
  3. National Research Foundation Singapore
  4. Singapore Ministry of Education under the Research Centers of Excellence initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims PCR amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels are increasingly used for clinical diagnostic assays. Amplification bias is a well-known limitation of PCR amplicon-based approaches. We sought to characterise lower-performance amplicons in an off-the-shelf NGS panel (TruSight Myeloid Sequencing Panel) for myeloid neoplasms and attempted to patch the low read depth for one of the affected genes, CEBPA. Methods We performed targeted NGS of 158 acute myeloid leukaemia samples and analysed the amplicon read depths across 568 amplicons to identify lower-performance amplicons. We also correlated the amplicon read depths with the template GC content. Finally, we attempted to patch the low read depth for CEBPA using a parallel library preparation (Nextera XT) workflow. Results We identified 16 lower-performance amplicons affecting nine genes, including CEBPA. There was a slight negative correlation between the amplicon read depths and template GC content. Addition of the separate CEBPA library generated a minimum read depth per base across the CEBPA gene ranging from 268x to 758x across eight samples. Conclusions The identification of lower-performance amplicons will be informative to laboratories intending to use this panel. We have also demonstrated proof-of-concept that different libraries (TruSight Myeloid and Nextera XT) can be combined and sequenced on the same flow cell to generate additional reads for CEBPA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available