4.6 Article

Conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13775-9

Keywords

Mental health; Public mental health; Indicators; Conceptual framework; Co-production

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research [BH154142]
  2. NIHR
  3. University College London Hospital (UCLH)
  4. Biomedical Research Centre
  5. NIHR Senior Investigator award
  6. NIHR Applied Research Collaborative (ARC) North Thames
  7. NIHR ARC North East and North Cumbria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a comprehensive conceptual framework for public mental health by integrating academic research, policy and practitioner views, and lived experience perspectives. Through stakeholder consultations, 55 determinants were identified and organized into four levels: individual, family, community, and structural. The research highlighted the importance of using multiple sources to create a comprehensive model through shared understanding and prioritization.
Background Numerous determinants have been linked to public mental health; however, they have not been brought together in a comprehensive conceptual framework. The goal of this work was to bring together academic research, practitioner expertise, and public perspectives to create a public mental health conceptual framework. Methods The development process proceeded in four stages. First, we identified a comprehensive list of potential determinants through a state-of-the-art academic literature review, grey literature review, and created mind maps created by peer researchers. Next, we conducted in-person workshops, consultations, and an online survey with academics, practitioners, policy makers, and members of the public to review the potential determinants, nominate additional determinants, and prioritise determinants by importance for understanding public mental health. This iterative process resulted in the final list of determinants contained in the framework. We then conducted rapid reviews to define each determinant and to identify key research, interventions, and resources. Finally, we worked with a design team to visualise the conceptual framework as an online tool and printable infographic. Results We found substantial overlap between sources reflecting a shared understanding of the key drivers of public mental health. The unique determinants that emerged from each data source highlighted the importance of using multiple sources to create a comprehensive model. 72 potential determinants were prioritised through stakeholder consultations, resulting in a final list of 55 determinants and organised into four levels: individual, family, community, and structural. Conclusions This is the most complete conceptual framework for public mental health to date, bringing together academic research, policy and practitioner views, and lived experience perspectives. The co-production processes and tools we used provides a template for researchers looking to include multiple perspectives in their research. The conceptual framework draws together current knowledge on each determinant, but also highlights areas where further research is needed to better understand the relationship between each factor and mental health, which can inform the research agenda. This online tool and infographic can be used by practitioners to identify interventions for promoting mental health, and by the general public as a resource to increase awareness of the broad factors which shape public mental health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available