4.5 Article

Heterotopic ossification after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a case cohort study

Journal

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05582-5

Keywords

Temporomandibular joint; Alloplastic joint replacement; Complication; Heterotopic ossification

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Science Research Project [20Y11903900, 20S31902500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HO after alloplastic TJR with fat graft was generally not severe except for type IV, which was associated with ankylosis. Preserving sufficient TJR space was important for ankylosis prevention.
Background: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is one of the serious complications leading to the failure of alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement (TJR). However, there was few research on its exact incidence and occurrence. Severe HO might result in pain and limited mouth opening after surgery. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify its clinical and imaging manifestations. The purpose of this study was to study the occurrence and classify HO after the alloplastic TJR. Method: Patients who underwent standard TJR (Zimmer Biomet stock prostheses or Chinese stock prostheses) with fat graft and at least 1-year-follow-up were included. HO was classified into 4 types according to postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Type and occurrence in different TMJ disease were compared. Joint space within 1 week after operation was measured and compared between HO and non-HO TJRs. Maximum incisal opening (MIO), pain, and quality of life (QoL) were recorded and their relevance with HO was analyzed statistically. Result: 81cases with 101 joints were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 22.9 months (12 similar to 56 months). Among the 48 joints, 27 (56.3%) were type I (bone islands); 16 (33.3%) were type II (bone spurs from the mandibular ramus); 3 (6.3%) were type III (bone spurs from the fossa); and 2 (4.2%) were type IV (bone spurs from both the mandibular ramus and fossa). In HO patients, joint space in type IV was smaller than the other 3 types. Pain scores in HO were significantly greater than non-HO patients before and after operations (p < 0.05). 1 patient in Type IV HO developed ankylosis and had prosthesis revision which accounted for 2.1% in HO patients and 1.0% in all TJR patients. Conclusion: HO after alloplastic TJR with fat graft was not severe except for type IV, which was easy to cause ankylosis. Preserving sufficient TJR space was important for ankylosis prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available