Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Machine learning in systematic reviews: Comparing automated text clustering with Lingo3G and human researcher categorization in a rapid review
Ashley Elizabeth Muller et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2022)
Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow
Ba Pham et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2021)
Using neural networks to support high-quality evidence mapping
Thomas B. Rost et al.
BMC BIOINFORMATICS (2021)
The views of health guideline developers on the use of automation in health evidence synthesis
Anneliese Arno et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2021)
Agreement in Risk of Bias Assessment Between RobotReviewer and Human Reviewers: An Evaluation Study on Randomised Controlled Trials in Nursing-Related Cochrane Reviews
Julian Hirt et al.
JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP (2021)
Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews
James Thomas et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)
The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application
Silvia Minozzi et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication
Heather Ames et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2019)
Machine learning to help researchers evaluate biases in clinical trials: a prospective, randomized user study
Frank Soboczenski et al.
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING (2019)
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Jonathan A. C. Sterne et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table
Simon Lewin et al.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2018)
Software support for environmental evidence synthesis
Martin J. Westgate et al.
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2018)
Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
Rohit Borah et al.
BMJ OPEN (2017)
Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study
Bruno R. da Costa et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2017)
RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials
Iain J. Marshall et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION (2016)
Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches
Alison O'Mara-Eves et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2015)
Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials
Susan Armijo-Olivo et al.
PLOS ONE (2014)
Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs
Lisa Hartling et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Gordon Guyatt et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Julian P. T. Higgins et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)
Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study
Simon Lewin et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)
How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis
Kaveh G. Shojania et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2007)
Share Paper
