4.4 Article

The role of miRNA-21 and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) process in colorectal cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 331-336

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204031

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF)
  2. Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA)
  3. National Health Laboratory Service Research Trust (NHLST)
  4. University of Cape Town (UCT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims The study was conducted to assess the expression levels of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) proteins (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, snail-1 and vimentin) and miRNA-21. In addition, we correlated these data with clinicopathological features in Colorectal cancer. Methods H&E slides from a total of 59 formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks were examined by a pathologist to demarcate normal and tumour regions. Immunohistochemical analysis of mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6) and EMT markers (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, snail-1 and vimentin) was performed. The miRNA-21 expression levels were determined using qRT-PCR and the data was analysed using the relative quantification method. The Fisher's exact and Pearson's chi(2) tests were used to correlate snail-1, E-cadherin, miRNA-21 and clinicopathological data. Results Our results showed a statistically significant correlation between high miRNA-21 expression levels and E-cadherin positive cases. There was also an association between high miRNA-21 expression levels and negative snail-1 expression. No significant correlation was seen between miRNA-21 expression levels and clinicopathological features. Moreover, high expression levels of miRNA-21 were significantly associated with the sporadic cases. Conclusions Our data suggest that miRNA-21 in association with E-cadherin and snail-1 does not play a significant role in the development and progression of this disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available