4.5 Article

Effect of Preservative Treatment on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Bamboo (Gigantochloa scortechinii) Strips

Journal

BIORESOURCES
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 5129-5145

Publisher

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV DEPT WOOD & PAPER SCI
DOI: 10.15376/biores.17.3.5129-5145

Keywords

Malaysian bamboo; Preservative; Vacuum pressure; Physical properties; Mechanical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The treatability of Gigantochloa scortechinii with boron and copper chrome boron preservatives was investigated. The study found that both preservatives showed a high level of penetration and resulted in weight percent gain and extent of retention. Treatment also reduced swelling and shrinkage in bamboo, with a significant difference between radial and tangential dimensions. Treated bamboo showed differences in mechanical properties compared to untreated bamboo.
Using a vacuum pressure cylinder, Gigantochloa scortechinii was treated with boron and copper chrome boron (CCB) preservative at different concentrations of 2% and 3%. The treatability of untreated and treated bamboo, as well as its physical and mechanical properties, were investigated. Both preservatives showed a high level of penetration into the bamboo strips. Weight percent gain (WPG) and extent of retention of CCB-treated bamboo strips were higher than those of the boron-treated samples. Swelling and shrinkage were proportionately reduced with treatment, with a significant difference between radial and tangential dimensions. When compared to untreated bamboo, treated bamboo showed a greater reduction in radial swelling but a lower reduction in shrinkage. The mechanical properties of untreated and treated samples differed in modulus of elasticity (MOE) and compression. Untreated samples had the highest MOE of 26,100 N.mm(-2), while boron and CCB had MOE values of 22,800 and 22,900 N.mm(-2), respectively. Copper chrome boron samples had the highest compression value of 86.3 N.mm(-2), while the boron and untreated samples had values of 84.0 and 78.3 N.mm(-2), respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available