4.8 Article

Comparison of inhibitory roles on nitrite-oxidizing bacteria by hydroxylamine and hydrazine during the establishment of partial nitrification

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 355, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127271

Keywords

Partial nitrification; Hydroxylamine; Hydrazine; Nitric oxide; Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778057]
  2. Innovation Ability Cultivation Project of Doctoral Candidate of Chang?an University [300203211292]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inhibitory roles of hydroxylamine (NH2OH) and hydrazine (N2H4) on nitrite-oxidizing bacteria were investigated in a comparative study. The results showed that nitrite accumulation was achieved by adding NH2OH or N2H4, with NH2OH having a more significant effect. However, nitritation deteriorated after the cessation of inhibitors addition.
The inhibitory roles of hydroxylamine (NH2OH) and hydrazine (N2H4) on nitrite-oxidizing bacteria were investigated in a comparative study. The results showed that nitrite accumulation was achieved by adding 5 mgN/L NH2OH or N2H4 to two parallel sequencing batch reactors, with nitrite accumulation rate reaching 95.83% and 86.58% within 15 days after adopting aeration time control, respectively. Correspondingly, the maximum level of NO in typical cycles caused by NH2OH addition was 0.18 mg-N/L, which was higher than obtained for N2H4. NH2OH or N2H4 showed strong inhibition on Nitrospira and promoted the enrichment of Nitrosomonas, with the effects of NH2OH being more significant. However, nitritation began to deteriorate after the cessation of inhibitors addition. In conclusion, NH2OH was a better inhibitor than N2H4 for Nitrospira. The inhibitory role of NH2OH was primarily related to NO toxicity, while for N2H4 it was attributed to its own toxicity, with NO playing a smaller role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available