4.5 Article

Development of pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-one scaffold as novel CDK2 inhibitors: Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2022.128803

Keywords

Pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-one; CDK2 inhibitor; Design; Synthesis; Biological evaluation

Funding

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2192004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-one compounds were designed and synthesized as novel CDK2 inhibitors. The compounds showed significant antiproliferative activity in breast cancer cell line and demonstrated CDK2 inhibition in enzyme assay.
A series of pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-one scaffold were designed and synthesized as novel CDK2 inhibitors. By analyzing the common motifs of various known inhibitors, the designed compounds 1 were virtually screen for their inhibitory activity by docking into the active pocket of CDK2. The influence of different substitutes on the docking results was investigated. A total of 15 pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-ones 1 were synthesized by Paal-Knorr reaction, pyrimidine ring closure, bromination, Suzuki coupling reaction, amide formation and Knoevenagel condensation. The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) was used to evaluate the inhibitory activity of pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-ones 1 in the breast cancer cell line MCF-7 in vitro using Etoposide as a reference control substance. The screening results demonstrated that the designed compounds have significant antiproliferative activity, and compounds 1e and 1j were the most active compounds with IC50 values of 10.79 mu M and 10.88 mu M, respectively, being better than that of Etoposide (IC50 = 18.75 mu M). The enzyme inhibition assay was carried out against CDK2, the results indicated that the compounds 1e and 1j significantly inhibited CDK2 with IC50 values of 1.71 mu M and 1.60 mu M.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available