4.5 Review

Biomechanical analysis of ocular diseases and its in vitro study methods

Journal

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-022-01019-1

Keywords

Ocular biomechanics; Ocular diseases; Finite element modeling; Microfluidic eye chip

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62101231]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [2021JJ40618]
  3. Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [20202BABL212003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ocular diseases are closely related to physiological changes in the eye sphere and its contents. Using biomechanical methods to explore the structure-function relationship of ocular tissue helps reveal pathological processes and contributes to the diagnosis and treatment of ocular diseases.
Ocular diseases are closely related to the physiological changes in the eye sphere and its contents. Using biomechanical methods to explore the relationship between the structure and function of ocular tissue is beneficial to reveal the pathological processes. Studying the pathogenesis of various ocular diseases will be helpful for the diagnosis and treatment of ocular diseases. We provide a critical review of recent biomechanical analysis of ocular diseases including glaucoma, high myopia, and diabetes. And try to summarize the research about the biomechanical changes in ocular tissues (e.g., optic nerve head, sclera, cornea, etc.) associated with those diseases. The methods of ocular biomechanics research in vitro in recent years are also reviewed, including the measurement of biomechanics by ophthalmic equipment, finite element modeling, and biomechanical analysis methods. And the preparation and application of microfluidic eye chips that emerged in recent years were summarized. It provides new inspiration and opportunity for the pathogenesis of eye diseases and personalized and precise treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available