4.4 Article

A novel 7 RNA-based signature for prediction of prognosis and therapeutic responses of wild-type BRAF cutaneous melanoma

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES ONLINE
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12575-022-00170-2

Keywords

BRAF; Melanoma; Signature; TCGA; mTOR; Prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposed and validated a novel 7-RNA based signature to predict the prognosis of wild-type BRAF cutaneous melanoma (WT Bf-CM) patients. Functional analysis suggested that the predictive function of this signature might be related to the up-regulation of RNA splicing, transcription, and cellular proliferation in the high-risk group. Additionally, the study found that the prognosis of WT Bf-CM patients is highly related to the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.
Background The prognosis of wild-type BRAF cutaneous melanoma (WT Bf-CM) patients remains poor due to the lack of therapeutic options. However, few studies have investigated the factors contributing to the prognosis of WT Bf-CM patients. Methods In this paper, we proposed and validated a novel 7-RNA based signature to predict the prognosis of WT Bf-CM by analyzing the information from TCGA database. Results Dependence of this signature to other clinical factors were verified and a nomogram was also drawn to promote its application in clinical practice. Functional analysis suggested that the predictive function of this signature might attribute to the prediction of the up-regulation of RNA splicing, transcription, and cellular proliferation in the high-risk group, which have been demonstrated to be linked to malignancy of cancer. Moreover, functional analysis and therapy response analysis supported that the prognosis is highly related to PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway among WT Bf-CM patients. Conclusion Collectively, this study will provide a preliminary bioinformatics evidence for the molecular mechanism and potential drug targets that could improving WT Bf-CM prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available