4.4 Article

One-Step Homogeneous Immunoassay for the Detection of Influenza Virus Using Switching Peptide and Graphene Quencher

Journal

BIOCHIP JOURNAL
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 334-341

Publisher

KOREAN BIOCHIP SOCIETY-KBCS
DOI: 10.1007/s13206-022-00076-x

Keywords

One-step homogeneous immunoassay; Switching peptide; Influenza-A and influenza-B virus; Lateral flow immunoassay

Funding

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI19C1344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A one-step homogeneous immunoassay using the switching peptide H2 was developed for rapid detection of influenza viruses A and B. This method eliminates the need for washing steps and can be conducted in solution, with graphene used as a fluorescence quencher to enhance sensitivity.
One-step homogeneous immunoassay was developed for detecting influenza viruses A and B (Inf-A and Inf-B) using the switching peptide H2. As the fluorescence-labeled switching peptide dissociated from the binding pocket of detection antibodies, the fluorescence signal could be directly generated by the binding of Inf-A and Inf-B without washing (i.e., one-step immunoassay). For the one-step homogeneous immunoassay with detection antibodies in solution, graphene was labeled with the antibodies as a fluorescence quencher. To test the feasibility of the homogeneous one-step immunoassay, the stability of the antibody complex with the switching peptide was evaluated under different pH and salt conditions. The one-step homogeneous immunoassay with switching peptide was conducted using influenza virus antigens in phosphate-buffered saline and real samples with inactivated Inf-A and Inf-B spiked in serum. Finally, the one-step homogeneous immunoassay results were compared with those of commercially available lateral flow immunoassays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available