4.6 Article

Inhibition of the ventral midline thalamus does not alter encoding, short-term holding or retrieval of spatial information in rats performing a water-escape working memory task

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 432, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113979

Keywords

Cognition; Executive functions; Maze; Rat; Reuniens; Rhomboid; Spatial working memory; Thalamus

Funding

  1. University of Strasbourg
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  3. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  4. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the function of the thalamic reuniens nucleus (Re) in encoding, holding, and retrieval phases of spatial working memory (SWM). The results did not support the involvement of Re in SWM. Previous studies mainly used T-maze alternation tasks, and it is important to determine if Re is required in tasks with short information-holding delays.
Working memory (WM) is a function operating in three successive phases: encoding (sample trial), holding (delay), and retrieval (test trial) of information. Studies point to a possible implication of the thalamic reuniens nucleus (Re) in spatial WM (SWM). In which of the aforementioned 3 phases the Re has a function is largely unknown. Recently, in a delayed SWM water-escape task, we found that performance during the retrieval trial correlated positively with c-Fos expression in the Re nucleus, suggesting participation in retrieval. Here, we used the same task and muscimol (MUSC) inhibition or DREADD(hM4Di)-mediated inhibition of the Re during information encoding, right thereafter (thereby affecting the holding phase), or during the retrieval trial. A 6-hour delay separated encoding from retrieval. Concerning SWM, MUSC in the Re nucleus did not alter performance, be it during or after encoding, or during evaluation. CNO administered before encoding in DREADD-expressing rats was also ineffective, although CNO-induced inhibition disrupted set shifting performance, as found previously (Quet et al., Brain Struct Function 225, 2020), thereby validating DREADD efficiency. These findings are the first that do not support an implication of the Re nucleus in SWM. As most previous studies used T-maze alternation tasks, which carry high proactive interference risks, an important question to resolve now is whether the Re nucleus is required in (T-maze alternation) tasks using very short information-holding delays (seconds to minutes), and less so in other short-term spatial memory tasks with longer information holding intervals (hours) and therefore reduced interference risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available