4.0 Article

Young people don't tend to ask for help more than once: Child and adolescent psychiatrists' views on ailing mental health services for young New Zealanders

Journal

AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 684-688

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/10398562221115624

Keywords

child and adolescent psychiatry; mental health; health reform; service demand; youth suicide

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The survey found that New Zealand doctors working in child and adolescent psychiatry expressed high levels of dissatisfaction with the state of public mental health services. They identified that child and adolescent services were under great pressure, with increased demand, a stretched workforce, and social issues driving complex presentations. Recommendations were made to address these issues by expanding the number of psychiatrists and clinical staff, improving service design, and addressing wider problems.
Objectives To explore the views of New Zealand doctors working in child and adolescent psychiatry regarding the state of public mental health services. Methods All practicing child and adolescent psychiatrists/advanced trainees were electronically surveyed in August 2021. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of feedback was undertaken. Results Almost 100 specialists responded, an 80% response rate. High levels of dissatisfaction with current services and future service plans were identified. Content analysis identified an overarching theme that child and adolescent services were under great pressure, with subthemes of increased demand, a stretched workforce and social issues driving complex presentations. Recommendations were made for addressing workforce, service design and wider issues. Conclusions Multiple measures are needed to improve currently ailing child mental health services, including urgently expanding the number of psychiatrists and other clinical staff.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available