4.6 Article

An Insight-HXMT Dedicated 33 day Observation of SGR J1935+2154. II. Burst Spectral Catalog

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 260, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac67e4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFA0718500]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program on Space Science
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA15360300, XDA15052700, XDB23040400]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1838201, U1838202, U1838113, U2038106, U1938201, 12133007, 11961141013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insight-HXMT has observed the magnetar SGR J1935+2154 and found that about 15% of the bursts can be described by the CPL model, with a higher frequency of occurrence. The radiation intensity of these bursts is weaker compared to Fermi/GBM, but follows the same power-law distribution. Additionally, a burst with a similar peak energy to the X-ray burst associated with FRB 200428 has been discovered.
Since 2020 April 28, Insight-HXMT has implemented a dedicated observation on the magnetar SGR J1935+2154. Thanks to the wide energy band (1-250 keV) and high sensitivity of Insight-HXMT, we obtained 75 bursts from SGR J1935+2154 during a month-long activity episode after the emission of FRB 200428. Here we report the detailed time-integrated spectral analysis of these bursts and the statistical distribution of the spectral parameters. We find that for similar to 15% (11/75) of SGR J1935+2154 bursts, the CPL model is preferred, and most of them occurred in the later part of this active epoch. In the cumulative fluence distribution, we find that the fluence of bursts in our sample is about an order of magnitude weaker than that of Fermi/GBM, but it follows the same power-law distribution. Finally, we find a burst with similar peak energy to the time-integrated spectrum of the X-ray burst associated with FRB 200428 (FRB 200428-Associated Burst), but the low energy index is harder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available