4.6 Article

VLBI observations of GRB 201015A, a relatively faint GRB with a hint of very high-energy gamma-ray emission

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 664, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142919

Keywords

radio continuum: general; gamma-ray burst: general; gamma-ray burst: individual : GRB 201015A

Funding

  1. EVN project code [RM016]
  2. Northwestern University
  3. Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA)
  4. Chandra X-ray Observatory [22400511]
  5. State Agency for Research of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PID2019-105510GB-C31, CEX2019-000918-M]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-2007-2013) [725246]
  7. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [948381]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the afterglow phase of GRB 201015A through radio, optical, and X-ray observations. Several conclusions are drawn, including the possibility of this gamma-ray burst being seen on-axis and the presence of a reverse shock component during the early stage of the burst.
Context. A total of four long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been confirmed at very high-energy (>= 100GeV) with high significance, and any possible peculiarities of these bursts will become clearer as the number of detected events increases. Multi-wavelength follow-up campaigns are required to extract information on the physical conditions within the jets that lead to the very high-energy counterpart, hence they are crucial to reveal the properties of this class of bursts. Aims. GRB 201015A is a long-duration GRB detected using the MAGIC telescopes from similar to 40 s after the burst. If confirmed, this would be the fifth and least luminous GRB ever detected at these energies. The goal of this work is to constrain the global and microphysical parameters of its afterglow phase, and to discuss the main properties of this burst in a broader context. Methods. Since the radio band, together with frequent optical and X-ray observations, proved to be a fundamental tool for overcoming the degeneracy in the afterglow modelling, we performed a radio follow-up of GRB 201015A over 12 different epochs, from 1.4 days (2020 October 17) to 117 days (2021 February 9) post-burst, with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array, e-MERLIN, and the European VLBI Network. We include optical and X-ray observations, performed respectively with the Multiple Mirror Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory, together with publicly available data, in order to build multi-wavelength light curves and to compare them with the standard fireball model. Results. We detected a point-like transient, consistent with the position of GRB 201015A until 23 and 47 days post-burst at 1.5 and 5 GHz, respectively. No emission was detected in subsequent radio observations. The source was also detected in optical (1.4 and 2.2 days post-burst) and in X-ray (8.4 and 13.6 days post-burst) observations. Conclusions. The multi-wavelength afterglow light curves can be explained with the standard model for a GRB seen on-axis, which expands and decelerates into a medium with a homogeneous density. A circumburst medium with a wind-like profile is disfavoured. Notwithstanding the high resolution provided by the VLBI, we could not pinpoint any expansion or centroid displacement of the outflow. If the GRB is seen at the viewing angle theta that maximises the apparent velocity beta(app) (i.e. theta similar to beta(-1)(app)), we estimate that the Lorentz factor for the possible proper motion is Gamma(alpha) <= 40 in right ascension and Gamma(delta) <= 61 in declination. On the other hand, if the GRB is seen on-axis, the size of the afterglow is <= 5 pc and <= 16 pc at 25 and 47 days. Finally, the early peak in the optical light curve suggests the presence of a reverse shock component before 0.01 days from the burst.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available