4.6 Article

Multimodal Ambulatory Monitoring of Daily Activity and Health-Related Symptoms in Community-Dwelling Survivors of Stroke: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Validity

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages 1992-2000

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.002

Keywords

Accelerometry; Ecological momentary assessment; Outcome assessment (health care); Rehabilitation; Stroke; Telemedicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring in assessing daily activity and health-related symptoms among stroke survivors. The results showed that the monitoring method was feasible and acceptable, with high compliance rates. The multimodal monitoring correlated with retrospective self-reports, indicating its validity in capturing daily activity.
Objective: To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring, which combines accelerometry with eco-logical momentary assessment (EMA), to assess daily activity and health-related symptoms among survivors of stroke. Design: Prospective cohort study involving 7 days of ambulatory monitoring; participants completed 8 daily EMA surveys about daily activity and symptoms (mood, cognitive complaints, fatigue, pain) while wearing an accelerometer. Participants also completed retrospective assessments and an acceptability questionnaire. Setting: Community. Participants: Forty survivors of stroke (N=40). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Feasibility was determined using attrition rate and compliance. Acceptability was reported using the acceptability ques-tionnaire. Convergent and discriminant validity were determined by the correlations between ambulatory monitoring and retrospective self -reports. Criterion validity was determined by the concordance between accelerometer-measured and EMA-reported daily activity. Results: All participants completed the study (attrition rate=0%). EMA and accelerometer compliance were 93.6 % and 99.7%, respectively. Partici-pants rated their experience with multimodal ambulatory monitoring positively. They were highly satisfied (mean, 4.8/5) and confident (mean, 4.7/5) in using ambulatory monitoring and preferred it over traditional retrospective assessments (mean, 4.7/5). Multimodal ambulatory monitoring estimates cor-related with retrospective self-reports of the same and opposing constructs in the predicted directions (r=-0.66 to 0.72, P<.05). More intense acceler-ometer-measured physical activity was observed when participants reported doing more physically demanding activities and vice versa. Conclusions: Findings support the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of multimodal ambulatory monitoring in survivors of mild stroke. Multi -modal ambulatory monitoring has potential to provide a more complete understanding of survivors' daily activity in the context of everyday life. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022;103:1992-2000 (c) 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available