4.4 Article

Retiboletus atrofuscus (Boletaceae, Boletales), a new species from China

Journal

ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 204, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-022-03006-5

Keywords

Boletaceae; Phylogeny; Morphology; Retiboletus; taxonomy

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 32070023, NSFC 32060014]
  2. Key Projects of Youth Fund of Jiangxi Science and Technology Department of China [20192ACBL21017]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Education Department of Jiangxi Province of China [GJJ190168]
  4. foundation of Advantages of Technological Innovation Teambuilding Program of Nanchang City
  5. Foundation of Modern Agricultural Industrial System

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on morphological and phylogenetic analyses, a new species of ectomycorrhizal fungus collected from Jiangxi, China, has been described as R. atrofuscus. The fungus is characterized by its distinct morphology, including coloration of the pileus, hymenophore, context, stipe, and basidiospores. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that R. atrofuscus forms a separate lineage within the genus Retiboletus.
Based on morphological and phylogenetic analyses, an ectomycorrhizal fungus collected from Jiangxi, China, is described as a new species. R. atrofuscus is morphological characterized by a dark gray to black pileus, white to pale yellowish white hymenophore, a grayish brown to pale yellow context, which turning orange-yellow to rusty yellow when injured, a prominently and coarsely white to pale yellow to black reticulation on upper 3/4 or entire stipe, grayish yellow to pale yellow to yellowish brown basidiospores in KOH with measuring (7-)7.5-13(-13.5) x (3-)3.5-5(-5.5) mu m. Phylogenetic analysis results showed that R. atrofuscus formed an independent lineage within Retiboletus. Descriptions and hand drawings of the new species and comparisons with similar species are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available