4.8 Article

Highly efficient uranium extraction by a piezo catalytic reduction-oxidation process

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 310, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121343

Keywords

Piezo catalysis; Adsorption-reduction-peroxidation reaction; U(VI); (UO2)O-2.2H2O; Zn2SnO4/SnO2

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21876047]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1900105]
  3. Science Challenge Project [TZ2016004]
  4. Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program
  5. Thousand Talents Plan of Qinghai province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports a highly efficient uranium extraction method from water using a piezo-catalytic process. By utilizing a hollow cubic shaped Zn2SnO4/SnO2 as a piezo catalyst, the adsorbed U(VI) is reduced to UO2 and then oxidized to (UO(2)2)(2), which can be efficiently separated from the solution under ultrasonic irradiation.
In this work, a highly efficient uranium extraction method from water by the piezo catalytic reduction-oxidation process is reported by utilizing a hollow cubic shaped Zn2SnO4/SnO2 as piezo catalyst. The electrons and holes in Zn2SnO4/SnO2 are separated efficiently under the irradiation of ultrasound. After that, some of the piezo electrons reduce the adsorbed U(VI) to UO2, the others react with soluble oxygen to form H2O2, and oxidize UO2 to generate (UO(2)2)(2), which could be efficiently separated from the solution. U(VI) piezo catalytic extraction rate could reach -90% under the irradiation of ultrasonic waves (40 kHz, 120 W) within 5 h and only decreased by -3% after four cycles. The present work advances piezo catalysis as a new route for uranium extraction from water, which may be applied in the extraction or removal of U(VI) in the U-containing wastewaters, providing new opportunities for resource-saving and environmental enhancement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available