4.7 Article

Patterns and Impact of Fragmented Care in Stage II and III Gastric Cancer

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 5422-5431

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12031-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [5T32CA093245-15]
  2. Duke Cancer Institute as part of the P30 Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA014236]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that fragmented care for stage II/III gastric cancer patients is associated with poorer outcomes, including reduced preferred perioperative treatment and decreased survival rates. Factors associated with coordinated care include residence in metropolitan areas and treatment at academic and high-volume centers.
Background Optimal management of stage II/III gastric cancer requires multidisciplinary care, often necessitating treatment at more than one facility. We aimed to determine patterns of fragmented care and its impact on outcomes, including concordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and overall survival. Methods The 2006-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical stage II/III gastric adenocarcinoma who received preoperative therapy in addition to surgery. Patients were stratified based on whether surgery and chemotherapy/chemoradiation were performed at one versus multiple facilities (termed coordinated and fragmented care, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with fragmented care. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. Results Overall, 2033 patients met study criteria: 1043 (51.3%) received coordinated care and 990 (48.7%) fragmented care. There was no significant difference in time to surgery or pathologic upstaging by care structure. On adjusted analysis, factors associated with receipt of fragmented care included increasing age and distance traveled to the treating facility. Factors associated with coordinated care included metropolitan residence and treatment at academic and high-volume centers. Fragmented care was associated with a reduction in guideline-preferred perioperative chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.97, p = 0.02) and increased mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00-1.34, p = 0.05). Conclusions For patients with stage II/III gastric cancer, fragmented care is associated with inferior outcomes, including a reduction in preferred perioperative treatment and survival. Further work is needed to ensure equitable outcomes among patients as complex cancer care becomes more regionalized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available