4.6 Article

OPTIMAL FULL RANKING FROM PAIRWISE COMPARISONS

Journal

ANNALS OF STATISTICS
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 1775-1805

Publisher

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS-IMS
DOI: 10.1214/22-AOS2175

Keywords

Full ranking; Bradley-Terry-Luce model; divide-and-conquer; minimax risk

Funding

  1. NSF CAREER award [DMS-1847590]
  2. NSF [DMS-2112988, CCF-1934931]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper considers the problem of ranking n players from partial pairwise comparison data under the Bradley-Terry-Luce model. For the first time, the minimax rate of this ranking problem is derived with respect to the Kendall's tau distance, which measures the difference between two rank vectors by counting the number of inversions. The minimax rate of ranking exhibits a transition between an exponential rate and a polynomial rate depending on the signal-to-noise ratio. To achieve the minimax rate, a divide-and-conquer ranking algorithm is proposed that first divides the players into groups and then computes local MLE within each group, and the optimality of the algorithm is established through an approximate independence argument.
We consider the problem of ranking n players from partial pairwise comparison data under the Bradley-Terry-Luce model. For the first time in the literature, the minimax rate of this ranking problem is derived with respect to the Kendall's tau distance that measures the difference between two rank vectors by counting the number of inversions. The minimax rate of ranking exhibits a transition between an exponential rate and a polynomial rate depending on the magnitude of the signal-to-noise ratio of the problem. To the best of our knowledge, this phenomenon is unique to full ranking and has not been seen in any other statistical estimation problem. To achieve the minimax rate, we propose a divide-and-conquer ranking algorithm that first divides the n players into groups of similar skills and then computes local MLE within each group. The optimality of the proposed algorithm is established by a careful approximate independence argument between the two steps.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available