4.7 Article

Toripalimab (anti-PD-1) versus high-dose interferon-a2b as adjuvant therapy in resected mucosal melanoma: a phase II randomized trial

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 10, Pages 1061-1070

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.002

Keywords

toripalimab; high -dose interferon; a 2b; adjuvant therapy; mucosal melanoma

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [81972562]
  2. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program [PX2017042, PX2021046]
  3. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals' Youth Programme [QML20181101]
  4. Peking University Medicine Fund of Fostering Young Scholars' Scientific & Technological Innovation [BMU2021PYB001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the adjuvant therapy of toripalimab and high-dose interferon-a2b in resected mucosal melanoma patients. The results showed similar relapse-free survival (RFS) in both groups, but toripalimab had a more favorable safety profile. Therefore, toripalimab may be a better treatment option for these patients.
Background: No standard of care for mucosal melanoma (MM) in the adjuvant setting has been established. Meanwhile, relapse-free survival (RFS) is only w5 months after surgery alone. This phase II trial aimed to compare toripalimab versus high-dose interferon-a2b (HDI) as an adjuvant therapy for resected MM. Patients and methods: From July 2017 to May 2019, 145 patients with resected MM were randomized (1 : 1) to receive HDI (n = 72) or toripalimab (n = 73) for 1 year until disease relapse/distant metastasis, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was RFS. The secondary endpoints included distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: After a median follow-up of 26.3 months, the number of RFS, OS, and DMFS events was 51 versus 46, 33 versus 29, and 49 versus 44 in the toripalimab arm and the HDI arm, respectively. The median RFS was 13.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.31-19.02] months and 13.9 (95% CI 8.28-19.61) months in the toripalimab arm and the HDI arm, respectively. The DMFS was not significantly different between the two arms [hazard ratio (HR) 1.00; 95% CI 0.651.54]. The median OS was 35.1 months (95% CI 27.93 months-not reached) in the toripalimab arm, with no significant difference in all-cause death (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66-1.84) for the two arms. The median sums of the patients' actual infusion doses were 3672 mg and 1054.5 MIU in the toripalimab arm and the HDI arm, respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events with a grade >3 was much higher in the HDI arm than in the toripalimab arm (87.5% versus 27.4%). Conclusions: Toripalimab showed a similar RFS and a more favorable safety profile than HDI, both better than historical data, suggesting that toripalimab might be the better treatment option. However, additional translational studies and better treatment regimens are still warranted to improve the clinical outcome of MM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available