4.6 Review

A meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials of treating eosinophilic esophagitis with budesonide

Journal

ANNALS OF MEDICINE
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 2078-2088

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2101689

Keywords

Budesonide; eosinophilic esophagitis; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81973754]
  2. Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Innovation Team Project [2019-QN06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study updated the clinical efficacy and safety of budesonide in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis using high-quality randomized controlled trial results, showing that oral budesonide is superior to placebo in terms of efficacy. Additionally, it was found that the efficacy of budesonide in patients is not dose-dependent.
Objective Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, local immune-mediated inflammatory oesophageal disease. Although Budesonide is recommended as one of the first-line drugs for EoE treatment, its efficacy is still controversial in multiple studies. Due to the continuous emergence of new and reliable research evidence in recent years, we updated the meta-analysis using RCT trial results to evaluate the efficacy and safety of budesonide. Materials and method Retrieve the data of the randomised controlled trial literature from 2000 to June 20, 2021, on using Budesonide in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis from the three major databases. Based on the results achieved with the Cochrane risk assessment tool, evaluate the quality of the included literature to extract the data, and perform the Meta-analysis with RevMan5.4 and Stata15.0. Results A total of 958 articles were retrieved, with 10 articles finally included, thus forming a sample size of 712 cases. The main outcome indicators of the meta-analysis are as follows: (1) Histological remission: the Budesonide group performs better than the placebo control group when it comes to histological remission of injuries [RR = 23.82, 95%CI = (13.46, 42.21), p < .001]; (2) Eosinophil count: the Budesonide group is superior to the control group in terms of reduced eosinophil count [SMD = -1.34, 95%CI = (-1.52, -1.15), p < .001]. Conclusion More and more high-quality randomised controlled trials show that oral budesonide in the treatment of eosinophils esophagitis was better than the placebo group. Mounting high-quality RCTs have confirmed the efficacy of oral budesonide in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis and that the effects of this drug may not be so dose-dependent. It is safe to take budesonide for a long time, and this drug is a relatively ideal option for drug treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis at present, so it is worthy of clinical application. Key Messages We used high-quality randomised controlled trials to meta-update the previous results to further confirm the clinical efficacy and safety of budesonide. Oral budesonide in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis is significantly better than the placebo control group. We have confirmed the value of its clinical application and promotion by including more high-quality randomised controlled trials. We also found that the efficacy of budesonide in patients is not dose-dependent, and more research is needed to confirm this.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available