4.5 Article

Hunger state and not personality determines task participation in a spider society

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 190, Issue -, Pages 143-152

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.06.002

Keywords

animal personality; division of labour; internal state; social foraging; task specialization

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt foundation [B-152/20/20-21/787]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Task specialization is important for social success, but in social spiders, individual traits do not determine specific task participation. Instead, hunger state is the key factor influencing prey capture.
Task specialization is a hallmark of social success as it can minimize among-individual conflict in task participation, and thereby optimize colony productivity. Task specialization is therefore predicted to manifest as a consequence of social evolution. While age or caste in some species explains task partic-ipation, a recent hypothesis states that personality type determines differential task participation and thereby facilitates specialization. The social spider Stegodyphus sarasinorum exhibits no castes or con-spicuous dominance hierarchies or age polyethism yet shows consistent among-individual differences in prey capture. We tested whether one personality trait (boldness) determines task specialization by exploring the determinants causing consistent participation in prey attack. By integrating a personality type and individual hunger, we tested two mutually exclusive hypotheses. (1) Among-individual dif-ferences in personality determine consistent differences in participation in prey capture, leading to specialization. (2) Individuals are flexible, and individual hunger state determines the propensity to capture prey. We found that hunger state was the only significant determinant of attacking prey. By reversing individual hunger state, we were able to dramatically increase or decrease individual attack propensities. Spiders exhibited consistent among-individual differences in boldness, yet this personality type did not predict foraging participation. Therefore, we found no evidence for behavioural speciali-zation in prey capture. Our study emphasizes the importance of internal state as a mechanism underlying variable task participation, suggesting caution in attributing behavioural specialization to personality without appropriate integration of state-dependent effects.(c) 2022 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available