4.3 Article

Guidelines for non-transplant chemotherapy for treatment of systemic AL amyloidosis: EHA-ISA working group

Journal

AMYLOID-JOURNAL OF PROTEIN FOLDING DISORDERS
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 3-17

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13506129.2022.2093635

Keywords

Amyloidosis; non-transplant treatment; guidelines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This guideline recommends non-transplant chemotherapy treatment for AL amyloidosis patients, based on clinical presentation and patient tolerance. Targeted therapy evaluation and treatment methods for amyloid fibrils are urgently needed.
Background This guideline has been developed jointly by the European Society of Haematology and International Society of Amyloidosis recommending non-transplant chemotherapy treatment for patients with AL amyloidosis. Methods A review of literature and grading of evidence as well as expert recommendations by the ESH and ISA guideline committees. Results and Conclusions The recommendations of this committee suggest that treatment follows the clinical presentation which determines treatment tolerance tempered by potential side effects to select and modify use of drugs in AL amyloidosis. All patients with AL amyloidosis should be considered for clinical trials where available. Daratumumab-VCD is recommended from most untreated patients (VCD or VMDex if daratumumab is unavailable). At relapse, the two guiding principles are the depth and duration of initial response, use of a class of agents not previously exposed as well as the limitation imposed by patients' fitness/frailty and end organ damage. Targeted agents like venetoclax need urgent prospective evaluation. Future prospective trials should include advanced stage patients to allow for evidence-based treatment decisions. Therapies targeting amyloid fibrils or those reducing the proteotoxicity of amyloidogenic light chains/oligomers are urgently needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available