4.5 Article

Molecular Detection of Rickettsia felis in Fleas of Companion Animals in East Texas

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages 416-419

Publisher

AMER SOC TROP MED & HYGIENE
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0783

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sam Houston State University new faculty startup funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the prevalence of rickettsiae associated with fleas on companion dogs and cats in Walker and Montgomery Counties, East Texas. The results revealed the presence of R. felis in flea samples from dogs and highlighted the potential risk of flea-borne spotted fever to humans.
Flea-borne spotted fever is an emerging insect-borne rickettsial infection caused by Rickettsia felis and has been identified worldwide. This study sought to explore the prevalence of rickettsiae associated with fleas on com-panion dogs and cats from Walker and Montgomery Counties in East Texas. Fleas were collected from animals entering local veterinary clinics for routine checkups. Collected fleas were identified as Ctenocephalides felis or Pulex irritans and analyzed by polymerase chain reaction for the presence of rickettsiae and subsequent sequencing. An estimation of the bcMLE (bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimation) of pooled samples was calculated. Four hundred eighty-eight fleas (comprising C. felis and P. irritans) were collected from 16 cats and 77 dogs. Our results demonstrate R. felis in 21 pools of fleas from dogs (bcMLE 15.28%) and a bcMLE of 7.25% from flea samples collected from cats. Sequence anal-ysis revealed R. felis as the only Rickettsia that could be amplified in our samples using the rickettsial citrate synthase gene and subsequent sequencing. In this study, the presence of R. felis in fleas from companion cats and dogs suggests a potential risk of flea-borne spotted fever in humans who encounter flea-infested animals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available