4.6 Article

Association of Intra-individual Differences in Estimated GFR by Creatinine Versus Cystatin C With Incident Heart Failure

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages 762-+

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.05.011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
  2. NIH/NIDDK [K24DK92291, U01 K60902, F32DK130543, K23DK128604, K23DK119562]
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs [SD-20387]
  4. American Kidney Fund Clinical Scientist in Nephrology Fellow program
  5. Akebia Therapeutics Inc
  6. VA Merit Award HSRD [IIR 15-369]
  7. University of California, San Francisco, Dean's Diversity Award [R01DK114014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The differential between eGFR(cys) and eGFR(cr) is associated with the risk of heart failure among patients with chronic kidney disease. Diverging slopes over time between eGFR(cys) and eGFR(cr) are also independently associated with the risk of heart failure.
Rationale & Objective: Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is associated with heart failure (HF) risk. However, eGFR based on cystatin C (eGFR(cys)) and creatinine (eGFR(cr)) may differ substantially within an individual. The clinical implications of these differences for risk of HF among persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are unknown. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: 4,512 adults with CKD and without prevalent HF who enrolled in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study. Exposure: Difference in GFR estimates (eGFR(diff); ie, eGFR(cys) minus eGFR(cr)). Outcome: Incident HF hospitalization. Analytical Approach: Fine-Gray proportional subhazards regression was used to investigate the associations of baseline, time-updated, and slope of eGFR(diff) with incident HF. Results: Of 4,512 participants, one-third had eGFR(cys) and eGFR(cr) values that differed by over 15 mL/min/1.73 m(2). In multivariable-adjusted models, each 15 mL/min/1.73 m(2) lower baseline eGFR(diff) was associated with higher risk of incident HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20 [95% CI, 1.07-1.34]). In time-updated analyses, those with eGFRdiff less than -15 mL/min/1.73 m(2) had higher risk of incident HF hospitalization (HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.39-2.86]), and those with eGFR(diff) >= 15 mL/ min/1.73 m(2) had lower risk of incident HF hospitalization (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49-0.91]) compared with participants with similar eGFR(cys) and eGFR(cr). Participants with faster declines in eGFR(cys) relative to eGFR(cr) had higher risk of incident HF (HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.19-1.85]) compared with those in whom eGFR(cys) and eGFR(cr) declined in parallel. Limitations: Entry into the CRIC Study was determined by eGFR(cr), which constrained the range of baseline eGFR(cr)-but not eGFR(cys)-values. Conclusions: Among persons with CKD who have large differences between eGFR(cys) and eGFR(cr), risk for incident HF is more strongly associated with eGFR(cys). Diverging slopes between eGFR(cys) and eGFR(cr) over time are also independently associated with risk of incident HF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available