4.5 Article

Diversity of leadership in academic emergency medicine: Are we making progress?

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 6-13

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.04.009

Keywords

Emergency medicine; Leadership; Ethnicity; Female; Faculty medical; Career mobility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found significant disparities in leadership roles and academic rank for women and URiM faculty in emergency medicine, with no changes in this gap over a six-year period.
Background: Faculty who identify as women or racial/ethnic groups underrepresented in medicine (URiM) are less likely to occupy senior leadership positions or be promoted. Recent attention has focused on interventions to decrease this gap; thus, we aim to evaluate changes in leadership and academic promotion for these populations over time.Methods: Successive cross-sectional observational study of six years (2015 to 2020) of data from the Academy of Administrators/Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine-Benchmark Survey. Primary analyses focused on gender/URiM differences in leadership roles and academic rank. Secondary analysis focused on disparities during the first 10 years of practice. Statistical modeling was conducted to address the primary aim of assessing differences in gender/URiM representation in EM leadership roles/rank over time.Results: 12,967 responses were included (4589 women, 8378 men). Women had less median years as faculty (7 vs 11). Women and URiM were less likely to hold a leadership role and had lower academic rank with no change over the study period. More women were consistently in the early career cohort (within 10 years or less as faculty) : 2015 =-75.0% [95% CI:+/- 3.8%] v 61.4% [95% CI:+/- 3.0%]; 2020 =-75.1% [95% CI: +/- 2.9%] v 63.3%, [95% CI:: +/- 2.5%]. Men were significantly more likely to have any leadership role compared to women in 2015 and 2020 (2015 = 54.3% [95% CI: +/- 3.1%] v 44.8%, [95% CI: +/- 4.3%]; 2020 = 43.1% [95% CI:+/- 2.5%] v 34.8 [95% CI:+/- 3.1%]). Higher academic rank (associate/professor) was significantly more frequent among early career men than women in 2015 (21.1% [95% CI:+/- 2.58%] v 12.9%; [95% CI:+/- 3.0%]) and 2020 (23.1% [95% CI:+/- 2.2%] v 17.4%; [95% CI:+/- 2.5%]).Conclusions: Disparities in women and URiM faculty leadership and academic rank persist, with no change over a six-year time span. Men early career faculty are more likely to hold leadership positions and be promoted to higher academic rank, suggesting early career inequities must be a target for future interventions.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available