Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages 479-502Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajae.12322
Keywords
food insecurity; SNAP; unemployment insurance
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper examines the effects of unemployment insurance expansions on household food insecurity in the United States. The study finds that increasing state weekly UI benefits can reduce the likelihood and severity of food insecurity among eligible families. Additionally, the research provides strong evidence of program substitution between UI and SNAP, with potential cost savings for SNAP.
This paper examines the effects of unemployment insurance (UI) expansions on household food insecurity in the United States using the Food Security Supplement to the Current Population Survey for 1999-2017. We exploit the plausibly exogenous variation in state maximum weekly UI benefits across states and over time. The two-part model demonstrates that a $100 increase in state weekly UI benefits reduces the likelihood of food insecurity among UI-eligible families by 5.6% and the severity of food insecurity conditional on being food insecure by 6.3%. We further present strong evidence of program substitution between UI and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which is the largest food assistance program with the stated goal of reducing food insecurity. Specifically, for every dollar spent on UI, 4-11 cents can be saved on SNAP, thereby reinforcing the social benefits of an UI expansion.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available