4.6 Review

How to quantify the impacts of diversification on sustainability? A review of indicators in coffee systems

Journal

AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13593-022-00785-5

Keywords

Sustainability; Agricultural systems; Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Input use; Socio-economic; Resilience

Funding

  1. Plant Sciences Group
  2. graduate school Production Ecology & Resource Ecology (both Wageningen University Research)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a systematic literature review on the impact of diversification on agroforestry coffee systems and their sustainability. The findings indicate that diversification has a positive impact on most dimensions of system sustainability, particularly in terms of ecosystem services and biodiversity. However, the lack of interdisciplinary and systemic perspectives in existing studies is a limitation. Additionally, there is a need for further research on the impacts of diversification on input use, socio-economic sustainability, and resilience capacity, as well as specific biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services.
Despite the potential of diversification strategies to achieve sustainability, diversified systems such as agroforestry are still not widely implemented by farmers, which indicates the need to further understand and adequately assess the impacts of diversification to inform the design of complex systems. In this paper, we conduct a systematic literature review focused on agroforestry coffee systems, to assess (i) how current methods and indicators are used to quantify the impact of diversification on multiple dimensions of system sustainability, and (ii) to assess the impact of diversification through coffee agroforestry on multiple dimensions of sustainability. Our analysis was based on 215 selected papers and all the indicators identified could be classified in one of the sustainability dimensions proposed in our framework: ecosystem services (57.2%), biodiversity (35.6%), input use (4%), socio-economic sustainability (2.7%) and resilience capacity (0.5%). Despite the broad scope of the indicators, individual studies were found to often lack interdisciplinarity and a systemic view on agroecosystems. Besides, not only were there few studies that included the impacts of diversification on input use, socio-economic sustainability and resilience capacity, but specific biodiversity attributes (e.g. functional diversity, landscape diversity) and ecosystem services (e.g. soil biological quality, water regulation, pollination) were generally underreported. The impact of diversification was more positive than negative in all dimensions of sustainability, with the exception of crop productivity. Yet, diversified systems are associated with reduced costs and high yields can still be achieved in diversified systems with appropriate agricultural management (e.g. adequate number and type of shade trees). Key to reaping the benefits of diversified systems is that the diversity of elements is carefully integrated considering the impact on multiple dimensions of system sustainability. A better understanding of synergies and trade-offs remains crucial for the customized design of diverse and sustainable systems for a variety of geo-climatic conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available