4.7 Article

Quantifying canopy conductance in a pine forest during drought from combined sap flow and canopy surface temperature measurements

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 323, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108997

Keywords

Leaf temperature; Leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit; Penman-Monteith; Sap-flux; Canopy conductance; Transpiration

Funding

  1. INRAE-UEFP
  2. SWATCH project [ANR-10_LABX-45]
  3. ANR PHYDRAUCC [ANR-18-PRIM-0006]
  4. Region Aquitaine Athsne project [ANR-21-CE02-0033-02]
  5. French national research agency project MicroMic [2016-1R20301-0007218]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate determination of canopy conductance (g(s)) is essential for understanding water and CO2 exchange in forest canopies. This study used measurements of leaf-to-air vapor pressure difference and tree transpiration to calculate canopy g(s) in a pine forest. Different methods were compared, and it was found that they agreed under certain conditions but showed discrepancies under water stress conditions. The study also emphasized the importance of in situ surface temperature measurements for understanding canopy responses to environmental conditions.
Precise determination of canopy conductance (g(s)) is needed to quantify the water loss and CO2 exchange from forest canopies and their response to changing environmental conditions. In this study, we combined measurements of the leaf-to-air vapour pressure difference (D-L) derived from canopy surface temperature, and tree transpiration to calculate canopy g(s) in a pine forest at the ICOS site FR-Bil. The period covered was characterized by two consecutive droughts. The inversion of the generalised water transport equation (GT), along with its isothermal simplification (GT'), were used to calculate canopy g(s) and compared with gs determined from the inversion of the Penman-Monteith equation (PMT). A thermal infrared camera continuously monitored the canopy temperature and allowed to assess the time course of DL with half-hourly resolution. On average a 0.3 degrees C temperature difference was found between the canopy and surrounding air, with values ranging from -2 degrees C to +5 degrees C depending on the time of day, soil moisture and humidity. The three methods used to calculate gs, GT, GT' and PMT were in agreement under wet soil and low atmospheric demand, but differences up to 40% were found under water stress conditions when the canopy to air temperature differences led to substantial discrepancies between D-L and air saturation vapour pressure deficit at 8.2 m in the crown (D-8). Under such conditions the GT' method overestimated g(s) whereas the PMT method was closer from values estimated with the GT method. The contrasted behaviour of the atmospheric exchanges between the tree canopy and the overall ecosystem limits the use of the above canopy flux measurements alone to quantify the response of surface conductance to environmental drivers. Our results also advocate the use of in situ surface temperature measurements to better understand the response of plant canopies to environmental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available