4.0 Article

Perception of Somali pastoralists in Adadle woreda, Eastern Ethiopia, towards wildlife at the human-animal interface, conservation and wildlife population change

Journal

AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 1210-1217

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aje.13050

Keywords

diseases; Ethiopia; pastoralist; Somali region; wildlife-livestock interface

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pastoralists in the Somali Regional State have a negative attitude towards wildlife, considering them as a threat to livestock. Although they have daily encounters with wildlife, most of them do not believe that wildlife can transmit diseases to livestock. They generally dislike wildlife and do not see any benefits in protecting them. Wildlife populations have decreased in the past decade, which has implications for conservation efforts.
Pastoralists and wildlife co-exist in the Somali Regional State competing for habitat, food and water resources. A questionnaire survey conducted among 198 pastoralists, captured information on their perception of wildlife against the backdrop of wildlife population decrease, illegal wildlife trade and lack of quantitative and qualitative data in the area. The top perceived threats to livestock were drought (46%), wildlife attacks (33.8%) and diseases (20.2%). Daily encounters between wildlife and livestock were reported by 61.1% of respondents. Herbivores, including warthogs, accounted for the majority of these encounters (88.4%), whereas carnivores were rarely observed with livestock, except for jackals. The majority (92.9%) of the respondents did not think that wildlife could transmit diseases to livestock. Jackals were reported by 7.1% to transmit rabies. A strong dislike for wildlife was recorded in 99% of all respondents. All stated that wildlife should not be protected. Half of the respondents did not see any benefits in wildlife. Wildlife populations have decreased over the last 10 years, particularly lions and cheetahs. Pastoralist's attitudes and perceptions towards wildlife in the study area were negative, potentially affecting conservation efforts. There is an urgent need to improve awareness of the benefits of wildlife and to include wildlife in integrated human-livestock-environment surveillance systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available