4.7 Article

Analytical development on impact behaviour of composite sandwich laminates by differentiated loading regimes

Journal

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107658

Keywords

Variational method; Local indentation; Core crushing; Spring-mass model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to provide analytical modeling techniques for describing the dynamic response of sandwich laminated structures under low velocity impact. Through analysis and experimental validation, precise analytical formulas have been developed to accurately capture the energy absorption mechanisms under different loading conditions.
Given the widespread usage of composite components in critical structures within the aerospace and automotive industries, it is deemed as an essential task to determine the effect of normal operation phenomena on its performance in impact. In particular, the present study aims for providing the developed analytical modelling techniques which are needed for describing the low velocity impact dynamic response of sandwich laminated structures. Alongside the analytical models, experimentally validated high-fidelity numerical models are used to check both the validity of the assumptions made as well as the accuracy of the analytical results in the different considered scenarios. An extensive analysis of the sandwich laminate impact performance has been studied, eventually resulting in a much improved, herein developed analytical formulation which is capable of accounting for the differentiated loading, unloading and reloading indentation regimes as well as for the lower facesheet local deflections. These considerations, which are normally neglected in equivalent studies, allow a precise capture of the energy absorption mechanisms. (C) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available