4.5 Article

Albedo reduction for snow surfaces contaminated with soot aerosols: Comparison of experimental results and models

Journal

AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 9, Pages 847-858

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2022.2091975

Keywords

Jonathan P; Reid

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities under the Rad-Soot project [PID2019-109767RB-I00]
  2. Chilean Fondef-ANID [ID19I10359, ANILLOACT210021, 1221526, FOVI210064]
  3. Acquisition of Scientific-Technique Equipment [EQC2019-006105-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates through experiments that considering the shape and size of light-absorbing particles is helpful for predicting snow albedo, and the newly developed OptiPar model provides flexibility for optimal fitting.
Highly reflective snow surfaces are sensitive to contamination by light-absorbing particles. When such particles are deposited onto a snow surface, they reduce snow albedo, which leads to snow surface warming and accelerates snowmelt. To better understand and characterize the effects of light-absorbing particles on snow albedo, an experimental campaign was conducted in Cotos Port, Madrid Spain. A spectroradiometric system consisting of six spectroradiometers simultaneously measuring sun irradiance and snow radiance spectra over the range from 300 to 2500 nm was used. Measured snow albedo spectra were compared to modeled snow albedo spectra obtained with a novel snow radiative transfer model (OptiPar) developed by our research group. Comparison of these experimental and OptiPar-modeled results with results from open modeling software, such as SNICAR and snowTARTES, has demonstrated that the detailed consideration of soot aerosol shape and size is helpful for a good spectral albedo prediction and that OptiPar provides enough flexibility for optimal fitting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available