4.1 Article

Automatic detection of airborne pollen: an overview

Journal

AEROBIOLOGIA
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10453-022-09750-x

Keywords

Automatic monitor; Pollen; Fungal spores; Methods

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [451-03-9/2021-14/200358]
  2. Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia [6039613]
  3. Technology Agency of the Czech Republic Project [SS02030040]
  4. project SustES-Adaptation Strategies for the Sustainability of Ecosystem Services and Food Security in Adverse Natural Conditions [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16 019/0000797]
  5. FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology [UIDB/04683/2020, UIDP/04683/2020]
  6. European Social Fund [09.3.3-LMT-K-712-01-0066]
  7. Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT)
  8. EC ERDF PostDoc Latvia project [1.1.1.2/VIAA/2/18/283]
  9. [AP-2460-ePIN-V11-U1-D44520/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all available and developing automatic instruments for pollen monitoring, including their measurement methods, identification of airborne pollen, factors impacting measurement quality, and potential for further advancement in bioaerosol monitoring.
Pollen monitoring has traditionally been carried out using manual methods first developed in the early 1950s. Although this technique has been recently standardised, it suffers from several drawbacks, notably data usually only being available with a delay of 3-9 days and usually delivered at a daily resolution. Several automatic instruments have come on to the market over the past few years, with more new devices also under development. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all available and developing automatic instruments, how they measure, how they identify airborne pollen, what impacts measurement quality, as well as what potential there is for further advancement in the field of bioaerosol monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available