4.7 Review

Kinetic analysis of wetting and spreading at high temperatures: A review

Journal

ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 305, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2022.102698

Keywords

Wetting behavior; Wettability; Interface; Mass transfer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52165044, 51971101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviews the current status of wetting dynamic models, highlighting the challenges in understanding high-temperature interface kinetic processes for composite materials. Common analysis errors in metal-ceramic and metal-metal systems are identified in describing wetting dynamics.
The kinetic factors of the liquid-solid interface formation process are extremely useful in the design of composite preparation methods and the manufacture of comprehensive performance-controlled metal- or ceramic-based composites. Here, we review the available spreading dynamic models, focusing on wetting at high temperatures. There is yet to be developed a general spreading dynamic model with complete physical meaning that can accurately describe complicated surface-interface kinetic processes at high temperatures. In this work, we highlight common analysis errors in the description of the spreading dynamics for metal-ceramic and metal-metal systems. By unifying the expressions of the spreading dynamic models as the function f(v, theta d) and fitting the experimental data reported in the literature, we discovered that the molecular-kinetic model commonly used to describe adsorption-controlled spreading at room temperature and reaction-limited spreading model used at high temperature have a certain range of overlap. When the condition sigma lv(cos theta e-cos theta d) < <2nkBT is satisfied, these models are consistent in terms of mathematical functional expressions. As a result, distinguishing between them when the spreading behavior includes both adsorption and reaction is challenging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available