Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
Volume 25, Issue 19-20, Pages 2967-2978Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13400
Keywords
feminist theory; functional disorder; healthcare encounters; irritable bowel syndrome; narrative; patient experience; power relations
Categories
Funding
- Swedish Medical Research Council [13409, 21691, 21692]
- Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation
- University of Gothenburg, Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC)
- Sahlgrenska Academy
- University of Gothenburg
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Gothenburg
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Aims and objectives. This study aimed to explore patients' experiences of healthcare encounters in severe irritable bowel syndrome. Background. Irritable bowel syndrome is a common functional disorder with symptoms such as abdominal pain and disturbed bowel habits, the cause of which is not completely known. Treatments options are limited, and healthcare encounters in irritable bowel syndrome have been described as unsatisfying and frustrating for both patients and professional healthcare providers. Furthermore, the influence of power on healthcare encounters has long been recognised, especially regarding the disadvantaged position of those suffering from functional illness which cannot be identified by commonly used tests or investigations. Methods. We interviewed 10 patients during 2014, all attending an outpatient clinic and suffering from severe irritable bowel syndrome. Relying on narrative and feminist theory, we explored how they actively negotiate professional discourse communicated to them in the clinical encounter. Results. The patients' experiences of healthcare encounters in irritable bowel syndrome were mostly described as negative, and often induced feelings of confusion and self-doubt. Positive encounters were described as being listened to, believed and taken seriously. Narrators found it especially problematic when healthcare professionals described irritable bowel syndrome as a minor disorder with primarily stress or psychological aetiology and put the responsibility for recovery onto the patient. Patients' actively negotiated such professional discourse by presenting a counternarrative describing their own suffering and strengths, experienced healthcare shortcomings and possible organic aetiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Conclusions. Patients suffering from severe irritable bowel syndrome described how they often felt a need to protect their positive identities in the face of trivialisation and disbelief by healthcare professionals.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available