4.6 Article

Epigenetic Pyrimidine Nucleotides in Competition with Natural dNTPs as Substrates for Diverse DNA Polymerases

Journal

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages 2781-2788

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.2c00342

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [20-00885X, 22-12023S]
  2. European Regional Development Fund, OP RDE [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000729]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By systematically studying five 2'-deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) derived from epigenetic pyrimidines, it was found that these modified pyrimidine dNTPs can be incorporated into DNA by DNA polymerases. This incorporation of modified nucleotides into DNA could potentially lead to gene silencing and affect the replication of modified bacteriophage genomes.
: Five 2 '-deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) derived from epigenetic pyrimidines (5-methylcytosine, 5hydroxymethylcytosine, 5-formylcytosine, 5-hydroxymethyluracil, and 5-formyluracil) were prepared and systematically studied as substrates for nine DNA polymerases in competition with natural dNTPs by primer extension experiments. The incorporation of these substrates was evaluated by a restriction endonucleases cleavage-based assay and by a kinetic study of single nucleotide extension. All of the modified pyrimidine dNTPs were good substrates for the studied DNA polymerases that incorporated a significant percentage of the modified nucleotides into DNA even in the presence of natural nucleotides. 5-Methylcytosine dNTP was an even better substrate for most polymerases than natural dCTP. On the other hand, 5-hydroxymethyl-2 '-deoxyuridine triphosphate was not the best substrate for SPO1 DNA polymerase, which naturally synthesizes 5hmU-rich genomes of the SPO1 bacteriophage. The results shed light onto the possibility of gene silencing through recycling and random incorporation of epigenetic nucleotides and into the replication of modified bacteriophage genomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available