4.3 Article

Deficient RNA-editing enzyme ADAR2 in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patient with a FUSP525L mutation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 32, Issue -, Pages 128-129

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.12.039

Keywords

Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 2; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Fused in sarcoma

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H05667, 25253063] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the fused in sarcoma (FUS) gene can cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and FUS gene mutations have been reported in sporadic ALS patients with basophilic cytoplasmic inclusions. Deficiency of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 2 (ADAR2), an enzyme that specifically catalyzes GluA2 Q/R site editing, has been reported in considerable proportions of spinal motor neurons of the majority of sporadic ALS patients. We describe the relationship between GluA2 Q/12 site-editing efficiency and FUS-positive inclusions in a patient with FUSP525L. A 24-year-old woman with ALS presented with basophilic cytoplasmic inclusions, significantly reduced GluA2 Q/R site-editing efficiency in the spinal motor neurons, and markedly decreased ADAR2 mRNA levels. Neuropathologic examination showed that not all spinal motor neurons expressed ADAR2 and revealed FUS-positive cytoplasmic inclusions in motor neurons irrespective of ADAR2 immunoreactivity. There were no phosphorylated transactive response (TAR) DNA-binding protein 43 kDa (TDP-43)-positive inclusions, indicating that there was no tight correlation between ADAR2 deficiency and TDP-43 deposition. ADAR2 deficiency can occur in ALS patients with a FUSP525L mutation and is unrelated to the presence of FUS-positive inclusions. FUS-associated ALS may share neurodegenerative characteristics with classical sporadic ALS. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available