4.3 Article

Treatment of patients with mild acute ischemic stroke and associated large vessel occlusion

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 30, Issue -, Pages 60-64

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.12.029

Keywords

Large vessel occlusion; Acute stroke therapy; Mild ischemic stroke

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several recent studies have shown that patients presenting with mild acute ischemic stroke (mAIS) symptoms may have an unfavorable natural history. The presence of associated large vessel occlusion (LVO) may lead to even worse outcomes, but most mAIS patients are still excluded from acute stroke treatment (AST). A retrospective review of patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting to our institution between 2010 and 2014 was carried out. Inclusion criteria were mAIS (initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] <= 7) due to LVO, presenting within 6 hours from onset. Demographics, treatments and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Favorable 30 day outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) <= 2. Out of 2636 patients, 62 patients (median age 63 years, 33 (53.2%) males) met inclusion criteria. The anterior circulation was involved in 74.1%. Median admission NIHSS and pre-admission mRS were 4 and 0, respectively. Twenty-three patients (71.8%) received AST (intravenous tissue plasminogen activator: 14, intra-arterial therapy: 4, both: 5). Favorable outcomes were 4.5 times higher in treated (78.3%) versus untreated (53.8%) patients (odds ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval 1.26-19.2; p = 0.028). None of the treated patients had symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. We demonstrate that a significant proportion of untreated mAIS patients with LVO have an unfavorable natural history. Our results suggest better outcomes in patients who receive early therapy rather than conservative management. The detection of LVO, even with mild clinical symptoms, may prompt rapid treatment considerations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available