4.8 Article

Face-to-Face Contact and Open-Void Coinvolved Si/C Nanohybrids Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes with Extremely Long Cycle Life

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 25, Issue 33, Pages 5395-5401

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201502330

Keywords

face-to-face contact; carbon aerogels; lithium-ion battery; open-void; silicon

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21206043, 21236003]
  2. Shanghai Shuguang Scholars Program [13SG31]
  3. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [13QA1401100, 15QA1401200]
  4. 111 Project [B14018]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To develop high-performance anode materials of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) instead of commercial graphite for practical applications, herein, a layer of silicon has been well-anchored onto a 3D graphene/carbon nanotube (CNT) aerogels (CAs) framework with face-to-face contact and balanced open void by a simple chemical vapor deposition strategy. The engineered contact interface between CAs and Si creates high-efficiency channels for the rapid electrons and lithium ions transport, and meanwhile, the balanced open-void allows the free expansion of Si during cycling while maintaining high structural integrity due to the robust mechanical strength of 3D CAs framework. As a consequence, the as-synthesized Si/CAs nanohybrids are highly stable anode materials for LIBs with a high reversible discharge capacity (1498 mAh g(-1) at 200 mA g(-1)) and excellent rate capability (462 mAh g(-1) at 10 000 mA g(-1)), which is much better than Si/graphene-CNTs-mixture (51 mAh g(-1) at 10 000 mA g(-1)). More significantly, it is found that the Si/CAs nanohybrids display no obvious capacity decline even after 2000 cycles at a high current density of 10 000 mA g(-1). The present Si/CAs nanohybrids are one of the most stable Si-based anode materials ever reported for LIBs to date.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available