4.8 Article

Improved renal ischemia tolerance in females influences kidney transplantation outcomes

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 126, Issue 5, Pages 1968-1977

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI84712

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the NIH [1K08DK092282-01]
  2. Penn Department of Surgery
  3. Health Resources and Services Administration [234-2005-37011C]
  4. Penn Transplant Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimentally, females show an improved ability to recover from ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) compared with males; however, this sex-dependent response is less established in humans. Here, we developed a series of murine renal ischemia and transplant models to investigate sex-specific effects on recovery after IRI. We found that IRI tolerance is profoundly increased in female mice compared with that observed in male mice and discovered an intermediate phenotype after neutering of either sex. Transplantation of adult kidneys from either sex into a recipient of the opposite sex followed by ischemia at a remote time resulted in ischemia recovery that reflected the sex of the recipient, not the donor, revealing that the host sex determines recovery. Likewise, renal IRI was exacerbated in female estrogen receptor alpha-KO mice, while female mice receiving supplemental estrogen before ischemia were protected. We examined data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to determine whether there is an association between sex and delayed graft function (DGF) in patients who received deceased donor renal transplants. A multivariable logistic regression analysis determined that there was a greater association with DGF in male recipients than in female recipients. Together, our results demonstrate that sex affects renal IRI tolerance in mice and humans and indicate that estrogen administration has potential as a therapeutic intervention to clinically improve ischemia tolerance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available